Monday, April 22, 2019

Women and Politics. Today's Women Role in Politics Compare to Essay

Women and Politics. Todays Women Role in Politics Compare to Aristotle View - Essay manikinThe male counterparts are agreeing to the voice of women and presence in politics. This is due to globalization that receivedly is eroding designer and ancient barbaric cultures that restrained women to the main officestead confinements. Generally, the perception of politics and women by Aristotle is remarkably diverse from the current elites who are encouraging women emancipation from male and obsolete cultures (Gurirab). This encompasses women attaining allowance to contend for various posts in politics, which is turnaround to Aristotles view. Aristotle maintained that the only befitting place for a charr was in the homestead confinements and non in public where men exercised their superiority granted by nature. According to Aristotles perception, women lack a place in public and especially in politics, since they are supposed to be at homecaring the household and what the economise p ossess. Currently, women tolerate surpassed men in politics by emerge as excellent through their leadinghip skills and organization (Adams 342). May be this is out of their natures ability to multitask which was non recognized before by society, which held them in low esteem. The todays public is acknowledging the presence of women in politics and preferring them especially in the developed postulates (Dufour & Isabelle 1167). This emanates from the civic precept, which encourages females to venture in politics plus the rights that deck out the woman. For instance, Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Indias 12Th leader and first lady to lead government after Abdul Kalam,four years currently. Women have contributed immensely in political and economical advancement, which has paved more emergency of women in high offices (Mandakini et al 20). Chinas 200 women hold senior positions in both research and politics, where in 2001 endorsed women state leaders. This exemplifies how women in toda ys politics have performed a key determination to the extent of sweet their counterparts trust while in top seats. Aristotles argument regarding woman in politics and her role are quite diverse from what the current woman is doing. He states that woman lacks authority, though in his debate does no expound he implied (Clayton). However, from the former perception and placement he held towards women, this implied that women were inferior to men. Hence, woman lacks the necessary assertiveness to incline men undertake certain responsibilities. His conclusion to low esteem of females might have emanated from the Greeks perception held against women where at 13 years girls were already wives (Newman 46). This deprived women chance in education and made them non having seemly knowledge that will catapult them in the political arena. The lack of adequate education and knowledge made woman still belief that she was inferior and cannot do anything without the husbands consent. Aristotle defines the liaison amid the husband and the wife closely as that of master and slave (Ford 9). Here, the woman has to incline at husbands command together with the small girls in his house. Mainly, the womans role was home-based in ensuring the man was content together with the children. Aristotles argument finds support from the Greek barbarians who still held similar outlook (Aristotle 17). However, the barbarians blame Aristotle for not distinguishing clearly amid slave and the woman. Since, he sometimes contradicts himself when he states that for any state to experience happiness, the woman essential be happy. This brings confusion regarding what is the exact relationship amid the couples and what level of education Aristotle proposed for women (Aristotle 17 -25). Since, this issue tends to shun what women leaders currently are

No comments:

Post a Comment